Who says the Fed has not, or is not about to, Bailout any Blue Cities or States?
|
|
The following
The main two things Stark leaves unsaid are that the very real and credible scenarios exist where Congress does not vote on any bailout, but the cities and states who were the most irresponsible and are largely Blue states (see this graph) simply walk up to the Fed discount window and say, “Uh, cough.” And the Fed coughs. Issuing bonds is like printing money anyway, so the Fed has said it may continue its money printing — why not do it for Americans, instead of foreign banks? It is no doubt the preferred option of The One, the unions, the cities and the states. Do you think the Democratic Governors of Illinois, California or New York would rather have free Fed cash, or face Congress?
Since Bernanke shows a tin-ear on money-printing concerns, Congress needs to pass a law banning the Fed bailout of spendthrift cities and states. It needs to be at the top of the agenda for the Republican House once they are sworn in next year. And by then, it may be too late. The second main thing that Stark did not mention is that for all we know the Fed is now accepting applications from cities and states for the Fed window — or has given or are about to give cities or states bailout funds or loan guarantees. Last time I checked, the Fed does not need permission from Congress to act. |